« Spain’s Assertion of Sovereign Immunity is a Challenge to the Court’s Jurisdiction, | Main | Odyssey Marine To Survey the Lusitania »

Land's End Site Case Management and Scheduling Order

equaljustice2.jpg

It would appear that the Land's End Case [Merchant Royal ??] is moving faster than the Black Swan. The reason is that Spain has a claim on only a PORTION of the cargo that Odyssey HAS YET TO RECOVER. Judge Pizzo has issued the following Court Order:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flmdce/8:2006cv01685/186117/118/

CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER:

This Court has managed this case concomitantly with another in rem action, case number 8:07-cv-614-T-23MAP, as both involve shipwrecks discovered by Odyssey with the Kingdom of Spain as a claimant. In answers to the Court’s interrogatories directed to the parties in both cases, Spain has invoked the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. For case number 8:07-cv-614-T-23MAP [Black Swan], Spain asserts the wreck is one of its naval vessels which warrants protection from suit under the Act. In the instant action, which the parties currently suspect concerns an English merchant ship, Spain’s claim of immunity relates only to a portion of cargo that this vessel may have been carrying but which Odyssey has yet to recover. In light of this uncertainty, as discussed at the Rule 16 conference held on June 9, the Court declines to defer discovery as it has in 8:07-cv-614-T-23MAP [Black Swan].

The Court has considered the positions of the parties as set forth in their Case Management Reports and as discussed at the Rule 16 hearing, and hereby enters the following scheduling and case management requirements whose provisions are very precise and shall be strictly adhered to. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Parties are directed to meet the agreed upon terms and time limits set forth in their Case Management Report, except as noted below:

(a) Deadlines relating to the dispute between Odyssey and Spain:
Rule 26 disclosures August 1, 2008
Odyssey's disclosure of expert testimony August 1, 2008
Odyssey's supplementation under R. 26(e) September 2, 2008
Odyssey's completion of discovery October 23, 2008
Spain's disclosure of expert testimony August 29, 2008
Spain's supplementation under R. 26(e) September 29, 2008
Spain's completion of discovery October 23, 2008
Third party/joinder/dispositive motions November 3, 2008
(b) Deadlines relating to the dispute between Odyssey and Keith Bray:
Rule 26 disclosures August 1, 2008
Mr. Bray's disclosure of expert testimony August 1, 2008
Mr. Bray's supplementation under R. 26(e) September 2, 2008
Mr. Bray's completion of discovery October 23, 2008
Odyssey's disclosure of expert testimony August 29, 2008
Odyssey's supplementation under R. 26(e) September 29, 2008
Odyssey's completion of discovery October 23, 2008
Third party/joinder/dispositive motions November 3, 2008

2. Parties are further directed to meet the pretrial disclosure requirements and deadlines in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) and to adhere timely to all requirements in Local Rule 3.06 concerning Final Pretrial Procedures, as supplemented herein at ¶ 6.

3. Parties shall take heed that motions to amend any pleading or a motion for continuance of any pretrial conference, hearing, or trial filed after issuance of this Case Management and Scheduling Order are disfavored. See Local Rules 3.05(c)(2)(E) and 3.05(c)(3)(D).

4. A Pretrial Conference will be held before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo in Courtroom 11B, United States Courthouse, 801 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, on December 1, 2008, at 10 a.m.

THE COURT WILL NOT ADDRESS DISCOVERY DISPUTES OF ANY KIND AT TRIAL. ANY DISCOVERY DISPUTE FOR WHICH THE PARTIES SEEK JUDICIAL RESOLUTION MUST BE ADDRESSED AT OR BEFORE THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES MAY AGREE ON ANY MATTER REGARDING DISCOVERY, BUT EACH PARTY ASSUMES THE RISK OF NON-COMPLIANCE BY THE OTHER UNLESS THE ISSUE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE COURT AT THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE.

5. This case is set for a non-jury trial in Courtroom 15A, United States Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue, Tampa, during the January 5, 2009, trial term before the Honorable Steven D. Merryday. Cases set before Judge Merryday are subject to being tried by a visiting judge. A separate trial calendar will be forthcoming in December 2008.

6. Not later than five (5) days prior to the date on which the trial term is set to commence, see ¶ 5, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court the following (and, as to each of the following, provide directly to Chambers, by mail or hand-delivery a "Judge's Courtesy Copy," so marked):

(a) Each side shall file a Trial Brief, with citations of authorities and arguments specifically addressing all disputed issues of law likely to arise at trial; and either (b) or (c) below, as appropriate.

(b) If case is a jury trial, the following:

(1) A concise (one paragraph preferably) joint or stipulated statement of the nature of the action to be used in providing a basic explanation of the case to the jury venire;

(2) A complete set of all written Proposed Jury Instructions (which shall bear a cover sheet with the complete style of the case and appropriate heading designating the submitting party; there shall be no more than one instruction per page and contain, at the end of each such instruction, citation of authorities, if any); they shall be sequentially numbered and party-identified (e.g., Plaintiff's Requested Instruction No. 1);

(3) Proposed Voir Dire (the Court will conduct the voir dire and, in addition to the usual more general questions, will without initiation by counsel ask more particular questions suggested by the nature of the case; counsel should, therefore, be selective in the jury questions submitted to the Court for consideration); and

(4) Proposed Verdict Form.

(c) If case is a non-jury trial, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (each shall be separately stated in numbered paragraphs; Findings of Fact shall contain a detailed listing of the relevant material facts the party intends to prove, in a simple, narrative form; Conclusions of Law shall contain a full exposition of the legal theories relied upon by counsel).

7. The Pretrial Conference [Dec 1, 2008] shall be attended by counsel who will act as lead trial counsel in the case and who is vested with full authority to make and solicit disclosures and agreements touching all matters pertaining to the trial.

DONE and ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on June 11, 2008.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Similar Subjects

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 24, 2008 8:51 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Spain’s Assertion of Sovereign Immunity is a Challenge to the Court’s Jurisdiction,.

The next post in this blog is Odyssey Marine To Survey the Lusitania.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35